• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:01:21 -0500
• In-reply-to: <00d801c2c73a$eca48230$7c01a8c0@n...>

jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>Lots and lots of (public) discussions at:
>
>RDF Interest Group (open membership)
>http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest
>RDF Logic (from whence DAML and OWL sprang -- debates even hotter and 
>more obtuse than some xml-dev classics)
>http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-logic
>RDF Core WG (readonly to non-WG members)
>http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg
>WebOnt WG " -- developing OWL
>http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg

Excellent list.  A few extras:
URI (still an active shrine of URI thought)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/

xml-uri (now a cemetery visited only by the morbidly curious + spam)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/

www-tag (W3C technical architecture group)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

urn-ietf (IETF work, now completed)
http://lists.netsol.com/archives/urn-ietf.html

None of these are light reading, even compared to xml-dev.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • URI Related Reading Material
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>

• References:
  • W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many)
• Next by Date: URI Related Reading Material
• Previous by thread: W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many)
• Next by thread: URI Related Reading Material
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread