• To: Mike Plusch <mplusch@c...>
• Subject: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:26:32 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>, Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• In-reply-to: <002101c2c03f$158f9840$6601a8c0@n...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0301191637060.24505-100000@s...> <002101c2c03f$158f9840$6601a8c0@n...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Mike Plusch wrote:
>>Would you want to write a window manager, operating system, or
> 
> database in
> 
>>Water?
> 
> 
> Absolutely.  The object-oriented capability security model would
> be a good start for a secure operating system.  Did I also mention,
> Water can be used as a shell programming language.

Now I'm totally confused. If Water is OO capability-secure then does 
that imply some relationship to _Waterken_?

  Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ConciseXML arguments
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• References:
  • Re: ConciseXML arguments
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: ConciseXML arguments
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Next by Date: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• Previous by thread: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• Next by thread: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread