• To: Mike Plusch <mplusch@c...>
• Subject: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:39:04 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <87iswkg8r8.fsf@n...>

> It _could_ be suitable for ALL applications.

Is the Water compiler/interpreter written in water?

Would you want to write a window manager, operating system, or database in
Water?

Assuming the answer to at least some of the above is no, then perhaps you
want to restate your goal with less marketing sheen and more technical
accuracy?
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ConciseXML arguments
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• References:
  • Re: ConciseXML arguments
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WebServices disagreements
• Next by Date: Re: 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped
• Previous by thread: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• Next by thread: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread