[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


No, Water is not related to Waterken (other
than both use the capability security model).
 
Here's a graphic showing the ancestory. (not mine)
http://www.erights.org/history/overview.html
 
I'm just saying that Water _could_ potentially
be used for building secure systems.
 
_Mike
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: ConciseXML arguments

Mike Plusch wrote:
>>Would you want to write a window manager, operating system, or
>
> database in
>
>>Water?
>
>
> Absolutely.  The object-oriented capability security model would
> be a good start for a secure operating system.  Did I also mention,
> Water can be used as a shell programming language.

Now I'm totally confused. If Water is OO capability-secure then does
that imply some relationship to _Waterken_?

  Paul Prescod


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member