• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:38:23 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <200301232203.h0NM3qr27004@d...>

> With REST at one end (where a Resource is some paraphenomenal
> abstract thing you can never get your hands on), RDF at
> the other (where a Resource is anything Identified by a URI
> and a URI is anything that Identifies a Resource) ...

So, do you think the authors of the URI and URL specs chose
bad names?

That "paraphenomenal" phrase is beautiful.
        /r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Processing instruction guidelines
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread