• To: rsalz@d... (Rich Salz)
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:37:02 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: jenglish@f... (Joe English), xml-dev@l... (xml-dev@l...)
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0301231935230.10377-100000@s...> from "Rich Salz" at Jan 23, 2003 07:38:23 PM

Rich Salz scripsit:

> > With REST at one end (where a Resource is some paraphenomenal
> > abstract thing you can never get your hands on), RDF at
> > the other (where a Resource is anything Identified by a URI
> > and a URI is anything that Identifies a Resource) ...
> 
> So, do you think the authors of the URI and URL specs chose
> bad names?
> 
> That "paraphenomenal" phrase is beautiful.

Or you could just say "noematic", my word-of-the-month.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Processing instruction guidelines
• Next by Date: Re: Processing instruction guidelines
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread