• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:49:41 -0500
• Cc: 'David Megginson' <david@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <002601c2bff9$cb29c770$6601a8c0@pcukmka>
• Reply-to: pdurusau@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914

Michael,

Michael Kay wrote:

<snip>

>
>
>In this country at least (the UK), you can be sued for issuing a false
>trade description if you sell a product under the name "ConciseXML" that
>is not both concise and XML. This is quite regardless of trademark
>protection.
>
>(Not to be taken as legal advice!)
>
How amusing! But, but, I have seen TV advertisements while traveling in 
the UK. ;-)

Just for amusement I checked for online resources for British court 
decisions and found this worth sharing:

Who is Suing Who in the UK?
http://www.mayallj.freeserve.co.uk/legal.htm

Made me start thinking that we need a: Who is Paranoid About Who/What in 
the US? service. ;-)

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@e...

• References:
  • RE: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• Next by Date: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Previous by thread: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• Next by thread: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread