• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 23:19:42 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3E333A3A.6030900@t...>

tbray@t... (Tim Bray) writes:
>Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
>> "Cool URIs don't change" is a bad joke
>
>Really?  I can't agree.  The online publishers who are technically 
>competent, as well as the emerging community of webloggers, really do 
>have a culture of taking care of their URI space.  This is a Good Thing 
>and should be encouraged.   -Tim

Encouraged, yes.

Made axiomatic, no.

The former lets us get work done easier.  The second wastes endless
hours on madness for which "philosophical" is far too generous a title.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: many-to-many
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many)
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: RE: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread