• To: "'Bryce K. Nielsen'" <bryce@s...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:42:25 -0800

XML parsers are required to preserve element order as encountered; not so
for attributes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryce K. Nielsen [mailto:bryce@s...]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: XML Dev
> Subject: Re:  malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
> 
> 
> > I wouldn't enjoy this. Elements and attributes are not the same
> > thing. Attributes don't have order. Elements do. Elements 
> can contain
> > other elements. Attributes can't. If I don't need attributes, I just
> > won't use them.
> >
> 
> Elements have order? I thought native in XML, elements were unordered.
> 
> I don't mean to keep bringing this up, but a lot of posts I 
> read here talk
> about elements being ordered, so I'm often confused since I've always
> thought one of the powers of XML was the ability to allow unordered
> elements?
> 
> -BKN
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 

• Prev by Date: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization
• Next by Date: RE: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization
• Previous by thread: RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Next by thread: Anchor tags in a HTML file having no file extension
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread