• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Is SAF dead?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:36:51 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1043661326.1874.59.camel@ibook>

At 10:55 AM 1/27/2003 +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When I have I asked about SAF [1] a year ago, SAF seemed to be still
>pursuing some kind of underground progression.
>
>[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200202/msg00153.html

Well, it progressed, then it seemed to have stopped entirely (I can't give 
details). But when I checked up on this today, there seems to be some 
indication that it may rise again.

>Can someone tell be if it's still the case and if there are any project
>or interest to defining SAF in relation with Relax NG schemas?

I think it would be a natural fit.

Jonathan 

• References:
  • Is SAF dead?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64
• Next by Date: Re: Is SAF dead?
• Previous by thread: Is SAF dead?
• Next by thread: Binary Encoding using Base64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread