• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Is SAF dead?
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 27 Jan 2003 19:41:23 +0100
• Organization: Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:36, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> At 10:55 AM 1/27/2003 +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When I have I asked about SAF [1] a year ago, SAF seemed to be still
> >pursuing some kind of underground progression.
> >
> >[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200202/msg00153.html
> 
> Well, it progressed, then it seemed to have stopped entirely (I can't give 
> details). But when I checked up on this today, there seems to be some 
> indication that it may rise again.

Sounds like good news!

> >Can someone tell be if it's still the case and if there are any project
> >or interest to defining SAF in relation with Relax NG schemas?
> 
> I think it would be a natural fit.

I'll mention it in my RNG book then.

Thanks

Eric

> Jonathan 
-- 
Have you ever thought about unit testing XSLT templates?
                                                     http://xsltunit.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Prev by Date: Re: Is SAF dead?
• Next by Date: RE: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: JITTs related article
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread