• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 16:40:42 -0500
• In-reply-to: <20030123163453.D8504@w...>

distobj@a... (Mark Baker) cites Roy Fielding:
> "More precisely, a resource R is a temporally varying membership
>  function MR(t), which for time t maps to a set of entities, or
>  values, which are equivalent."
>   -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2000Sep/0030

I think the "many-to-many" effectively denies (or makes deeply
contingent) the "are equivalent" at the end of that - at least that's my
reading.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Next by Date: RE: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread