|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: many-to-many
I'm not sure that's true. Ultimately, all you can model is the interaction between client and server. In this case, that means URIs and Representations. The Resource seems to me just a convenience for the server implementer, since the client can't know any more about than what it knows of URIs and Representations. I have wondered at times if the use of Resource in REST discussions has been more a tool to illustrate the architecutral style than an actual concrete part of the equation... --- Seairth Jacobs seairth@s... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...> To: "Joe English" <jenglish@f...> Cc: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: Re: many-to-many > >If we dispose of the inconvenient fiction > >of a "Resource", most of the metaphysical hooey > >surrounding URIs goes away. > > I'd like to watch you try, if only so I could watch the heads of > Fielding and the rest of the REST camp explode. > /r$ > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








