[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Why would you think this is not allowed? 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: David LeBlanc [mailto:whisper@o...] 
	Sent: Mon 1/20/2003 11:16 AM 
	To: Tim Bray 
	Cc: Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org 
	Subject: RE:  Element content
	
	

	So just to be completely clear on this, if a DTD allows it, then something
	like this would be legal?:
	<node>yada yada yada
	        <node> blah blah blah </node>
	etc. </node>
	
	or, in xml:
	<!ELEMENT node (node+) >
	
	?
	
	Thanks,
	
	David LeBlanc
	Seattle, WA USA
	
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
	> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 0:42
	> To: David LeBlanc
	> Cc: Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org
	> Subject: Re:  Element content
	>
	>
	> David LeBlanc wrote:
	> > A question has arisen about element content. I'm reasonably
	> sure I've read
	> > that it's illegal for an element to contain itself either directly or
	> > indirectly. Is this correct, and if so, can someone point me to
	> the relevant
	> > section of the XML Recommendation please?
	>
	> Perfectly legal, happens all the time.  Now *entities* can't contain
	> themselves, but that's a different kettle of markup -Tim
	>
	>
	> -----------------------------------------------------------------
	> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	>
	> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	>
	> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	>
	
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member