[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Why would you think this is not allowed? -----Original Message----- From: David LeBlanc [mailto:whisper@o...] Sent: Mon 1/20/2003 11:16 AM To: Tim Bray Cc: Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org Subject: RE: Element content So just to be completely clear on this, if a DTD allows it, then something like this would be legal?: <node>yada yada yada <node> blah blah blah </node> etc. </node> or, in xml: <!ELEMENT node (node+) > ? Thanks, David LeBlanc Seattle, WA USA > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 0:42 > To: David LeBlanc > Cc: Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org > Subject: Re: Element content > > > David LeBlanc wrote: > > A question has arisen about element content. I'm reasonably > sure I've read > > that it's illegal for an element to contain itself either directly or > > indirectly. Is this correct, and if so, can someone point me to > the relevant > > section of the XML Recommendation please? > > Perfectly legal, happens all the time. Now *entities* can't contain > themselves, but that's a different kettle of markup -Tim > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|

Cart



