• To: David LeBlanc <whisper@o...>
• Subject: Re: Element content
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:34:09 -0800
• Cc: "Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <GCEDKONBLEFPPADDJCOEGEPBHHAA.whisper@o...>
• References: <GCEDKONBLEFPPADDJCOEGEPBHHAA.whisper@o...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

David LeBlanc wrote:
> So just to be completely clear on this, if a DTD allows it, then something
> like this would be legal?:
> <node>yada yada yada
> 	<node> blah blah blah </node>
> etc. </node>

Yep.

> or, in xml:
> <!ELEMENT node (node+) >

That declaration is syntactically legal, but no valid element could 
exist (snicker).  Easy to fix though. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: Element content
    • From: "David LeBlanc" <whisper@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Element content
• Next by Date: RE: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Previous by thread: RE: Element content
• Next by thread: Re: Element content
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread