[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:29:32 -0800 , you wrote: >I've spent some time thinking about XLink, HLink, and why hardly anybody >likes either one enough to cough up an implementation. > >My impression is that both XLink and HLink miss the 80/20 mark; both cover >an amazingly rich amount of ground for a version 1.0 specification. Nearly >everyone I talk to agrees that smaller, more understandable, more modular >specifications would be better. A smaller specification that leaves room to >grow might be a better approach. I frequently use XLink simple links, and to me, the greatest benefit is the ability (using XPointer) to link to a specific region (for lack of a better word) of an XML document without having to modify the document as you do to use a fragment identifier in HTML. This linking is independent of display (as it should be), but can be used to by an XSLT stylesheet to generate suitable HTML links. -- Paul Spencer
|

Cart



