• To: xml-dev@l... (xml-dev)
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:17:32 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200301241940.OAA24799@m...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <200301241940.OAA24799@m...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Friday 24 January 2003 02:27 pm, John Cowan wrote:
> RDF people could do this too, by only referring to addressable resources
> with URIs, and using anonymous nodes for non-addressable resources
> (with predications linking them to suitable subject-indicating URIs).

Right. This is what I meant about context... you use a set of assertions to 
prescribe the meaning of a given URI (within that context). If you remove the 
set of assertions, the scope of interpretation becomes infinite.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: many-to-many
• Next by Date: Re: Processing instruction guidelines
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread