[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long)

Re:  Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long)
I wrote:
>I think Sean's got the overall story right, though I'm rather nervous
>about including W3C XML Schema or XQuery in "BOXED XML" - in large part
>because they seem themselves driven by the kinds of practices Sean
>suggests we avoid.

Oh, never mind.  While the later sections seem to take the initial
composition of BOXED XML for granted, the first two include bits like:

>if BOXED XML does not pollute this,

>AS LONG AS BOXED XML does not shove the object-serialization
>world-view down everyone's throats.

I think that takes care of my concerns as far as this excellent piece is
concerned, anyway.

Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.