[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Instrument DTD

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Instrument DTD
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:13:30 -0500
• References: <000001c2baf7$276b7f40$2001a8c0@bryans>

[bryan]

> I don't think you'll find anything general. Unless it was at the same
> time practically useless. For example when you say you want
> representation of instrument input/output I suppose the best you could
> hope for is some markup representing where and how you are supposed to
> get a hold of said input/output.


This bit sounds much like ACME, a software architecture description
language.  ACME itself is not XML, but an XML version is supposed to be in
the works, or you could turn it into XML yourself since it is a text format.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Instrument DTD
    • From: "Pardeep" <pardeep.ssb@i...>

• References:
  • RE: Instrument DTD
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [XML-dev] Instrument DTD
• Next by Date: RE: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-expressions vs. XML)
• Previous by thread: RE: Instrument DTD
• Next by thread: Re: Instrument DTD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread