• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:46:50 -0500
• In-reply-to: <oprjvgwhvqezizxn@s...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <oprjvgwhvqezizxn@s...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Friday 31 January 2003 11:18 am, Mike Champion wrote:
> Document and Messaging XML use cases certainly share a lot, but
> maybe they don't share everything.  I resist data-heads imposing their
> paradigm on XML as a whole, and I resist doc-heads insisting that data-
> oriented applications do it the One True XML Way.

That's the essence of Eriks message... and I think many of  the things he 
outlined for a data interchange language make great sense. Perhaps it is time 
for fork.

• References:
  • Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: XML in Real Life
• Next by Date: RE: Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML)
• Previous by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread