• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: namespace URI references
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:17:41 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1023-1F85C8D528A911D781E20003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r01050400-1023-1F85C8D528A911D781E20003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

> Does anyone know of XML namespace URI references that include fragment
> identifiers?

The XML DSIG namespace uri is an empty fragment:
      http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldisg#

This is kind of cute.  When they need URI's for things within that spec
(for example, to specify the type of cryptography), they apppend a "real
fragment" to the base.
      http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldisg#rsa-sha1

XML Encryption works the same way.  I don't know if it was Reagle's idea 
or he inherited it.
	/r$

• References:
  • namespace URI references
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace URI references
• Next by Date: Re: XML as generic villain
• Previous by thread: Re: namespace URI references
• Next by thread: Re: namespace URI references
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread