• To: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• Subject: Re: XML as generic villain
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:24:11 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <a05200f01ba4b0b5b01ee@[192.168.123.136]>
• References: <a05200f01ba4b0b5b01ee@[192.168.123.136]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Rex Brooks wrote:

> http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2908614,00.html

In the normal course of events, I see quite a few XML-related business 
plans cross my desk.  For some reason, from Q4 2001 to Q3 2002, everyone 
got the idea that they wanted to build XML hardware, I must have seen 5 
different XML-accelerator bright ideas.

Personally I couldn't see it, but I've been wrong lots of times, I also 
thought Ethernet was a joke when I first saw it :(  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML as generic villain
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • XML as generic villain
    • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace URI references
• Next by Date: Re: XML as generic villain
• Previous by thread: RE: XML as generic villain
• Next by thread: Re: XML as generic villain
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread