• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: ConciseXML syntax
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:07:31 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> of "Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:48:12 EST." <r01050400-1023-D9101B0A2A4311D781E20003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Sender: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

> uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji) writes:
> >My objection to their usage depends heavily on custom within the XML
> >community.  I thought this would go without saying, but I guess not. 
> 
> I've always assumed that "compatible with XML" meant "would pass through
> an XML 1.0 parser without a fatal error".  There are lots of ways to
> subset XML and remain compatible on those terms.

Ah, but

<simon>xmlhack rules</>

Will not pass through an XML 1.0 parser without a fatal error, so ConciseXML 
fails that test, right?


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Python Generators + DOM - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/01/08/py-xml.html
4Suite Repository Features - https://www6.software.ibm.com/reg/devworks/dw-x4su
ite5-i/
XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965
MusicBrainz  metadata - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi
nk14.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ConciseXML syntax
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: ConciseXML syntax
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ConciseXML syntax
• Next by Date: RE: ConciseXML syntax
• Previous by thread: Re: ConciseXML syntax
• Next by thread: Re: ConciseXML syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread