• To: mgushee@h...
• Subject: Re: Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 06:29:22 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030123052136.GD2843@swordfish> from "Matt Gushee" at Jan 22, 2003 10:21:37 PM

Matt Gushee scripsit:

>     Legal characters are tab, carriage return, line feed, and the legal
>     characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646.

Yeah, that sentence is poorly worded.  I suspect that the second "legal"
should be "graphical".

> Yet if the sentence I quoted above were incorrect, surely someone would have
> noticed by now and filed an erratum; there is no such erratum. 

Go ahead and file one yourself!  The XML Core WG is still processing errata.

-- 
Business before pleasure, if not too bloomering long before.
        --Nicholas van Rijn
                John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
                        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan  http://www.reutershealth.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode
    • From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>

• References:
  • Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode
    • From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Duplicate namespace prefixes
• Next by Date: Re: ASN.1t schema languages?
• Previous by thread: Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode
• Next by thread: Re: Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread