• To: "'Roger L. Costello'" <costello@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 18:51:30 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3E1713F6.ECFFB445@m...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> Thus, distance is poor interchange data...
> 
> Good interchange data is position.

The only way I know of to identify spatial position is as a distance
from some agreed origin.

I don't think this argument is useful. All data interchange relies on
the sender and recipient having some shared knowledge.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s...  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• References:
  • Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is thisapproach sensible?
• Next by Date: Re: Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
• Previous by thread: Re: Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
• Next by thread: Re: Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread