[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-expressi

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-expressions vs. XML)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:19:11 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Propylon
• References: <r01050400-1023-59FD04EE271111D798B80003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Reply-to: bill.dehora@p...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> We've talked for years about the value of separating content from
> presentation in XML.  On the data side, that seem to map easily to
> separating information from processing.

Data from processing; sure.

I've just remembered Bill Joy had a similar beef with HTML/XML a 
good while back. In an interview he once said the problem with 
sending markup was it had no behaviour - for that you need programs. 
It may have been in the context of Jini/JXTA.


Bill de hÓra

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-e xpressions vs. XML)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-e xpressions vs. XML)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML is not extensible
• Next by Date: Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-e xpressions vs. XML)
• Previous by thread: Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-e xpressions vs. XML)
• Next by thread: Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-e xpressions vs. XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread