Re: And do the other things. Was: many-to-many
bill@d... (Bill de hÓra) writes: >Go figure. You know, this semantic web stuff matters. It's important >to push our boundaries and apply some imagination to our problems. You've done a nice job of removing boundaries. I feel like you've taken W3C geometry and pulled out an unnecessary axiom, letting the supposedly uncrossing lines of URI-to-resource relationships cross. I suspect that in practice most people will continue to treat those relationships as if they don't cross, but dropping that piece opens some new and useful fields where imagination can flourish. You've put up a nice view of some of those fields at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0365.html I'm especially interested in how some of the issues you describe there for URIs appear applicable to more general XML processing: >Defensive coding is removed purely by relaxing the tolerances being >engineered to, because the intent of the system is that there might >be more than one. Great stuff here. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format