RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
> You can implement it, yes; you can't change the design > or adapt the specification. I can write up a document that says "here's a set of diffs to the PDF spec" and shop it around to get someone to stamp "standard" on my specification. Of course, I'm not likely to be successful, but I can do that. Just as I can do the same thing with the HTTP spec. > Java is an even more restricted case. Because MtView saw it as a weapon to nullify Redmond. That's why it's got the entanglements it does. > So maybe some fundamental Internet > technologies are better handled as proprietary > applications? Sure, except replace "fundamental" with "important" and just don't expect w3c to handle them. /r$
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format