• To: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• Subject: Re: Famous web services with apparent serious XML schemaerrors
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:55:36 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <04a401c2b9e4$e7221dd0$af00a8c0@jmg>

> But surely it's not supposed to be incorrect with respect to the schema
> that's used to specify how these results are supposed to look?  Are you
> forbidden from validating SOAP 1.1 content against a schema?

There are things expressible in SOAP RPC encoding (section 5 of SOAP 1.1)
that are not expressible in XML Schema.  In particular, look at all the
href'd elements.  So the answer, then, is "sometimes you can't."
        /r$

• References:
  • Re: Famous web services with apparent serious XML schema errors
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Still not the essence of XML (was Re: S-expressions vs. XML)
• Next by Date: ANN: Outsider's Guide to the W3C (revised)
• Previous by thread: Re: Famous web services with apparent serious XML schema errors
• Next by thread: Re: Famous web services with apparent serious XML schema errors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread