• To: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: WebServices disagreements
• From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:22:23 -0500
• References: <000001c2bffd$dca9ecb0$6d6979d9@d...>
• Reply-to: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>

> I didn't really 'get' this article ... Can someone with a more trained
> eye filter out the exact problem ...

It would appear the publications are entering some sort of 'ratings period' and
they're simply trying to stir up trouble.  To drive up page readership counts
it's a lot easier to rant about something with a ton of ambiguities and errors.
Pimping those numbers off to advertisers doesn't usually include a statement
that says the readership thinks the publication/author is an idiot.

-Bill Kearney

• References:
  • WebServices disagreements
    • From: "Gerben Rampaart" <VisualBasic@H...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ConciseXML arguments
• Next by Date: Re: XML and ConciseXML
• Previous by thread: WebServices disagreements
• Next by thread: Re: WebServices disagreements
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread