• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:05:25 -0800
• Thread-index: AcLI3HCDd2/7noIKTZqH9OFnYlKJFQAAG4Jw
• Thread-topic: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:55 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> 
> dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
> >Same here. I wonder what Simon considered food for thought. 
> 
<snip-comments-about-markup />

Ahhh, not interested in XML as markup so didn't really see anything here
that was worthwhile. 

> And in a totally different direction:
<snip-comments-about-binary-xml />

I don't agree with his reasons as to why there should be a binary XML.
However I do accept there others who want binary XML and have better
reasons than those he put forth. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Some days you are the bug; some days you are the windshield.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Prev by Date: RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Next by Date: Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Previous by thread: Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Next by thread: RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread