[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach

• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 01 Jan 2003 10:25:03 +0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <00e301c2b158$fd766b70$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0212301831380.9956-100000@i...><00e301c2b158$fd766b70$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• Sender: ht@i...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence)

XSV [1] produces XML output, including error reports, which contain
line and character numbers as attributes, e.g.

  <invalid char="5" code="cvc-elt.4.1.1" line="6"
    resource="file:///. . ./triv.xml">element {None}e2 with simple
                                      type not allowed attributes</invalid>

A stylesheet is provided which displays this in the traditional
lineno:charno format.

ht

[1] http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/xsv-status.html
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
• Next by Date: Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
• Previous by thread: Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
• Next by thread: Re: Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread