[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


John Cowan wrote:
> Similarly, if the order of child elements is meaningful, then the schema
> should allow the children to appear in any order; if the order is not
> meaningful, then there is no reason to allow multiple orders (other than
> backward compatibility).  If multiple orders are allowed nonetheless,
> people may easily come to believe that order has significance and use
> it as if it did.

Presumably a different rule applies for attributes, whose order cannot 
be constrained in any schema language I'm aware of, but should also 
never be significant.

Jim


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member