[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
John Cowan wrote: > Similarly, if the order of child elements is meaningful, then the schema > should allow the children to appear in any order; if the order is not > meaningful, then there is no reason to allow multiple orders (other than > backward compatibility). If multiple orders are allowed nonetheless, > people may easily come to believe that order has significance and use > it as if it did. Presumably a different rule applies for attributes, whose order cannot be constrained in any schema language I'm aware of, but should also never be significant. Jim
|

Cart



