[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess" mean?

what does adam mean
Here's a Water program that creates a class, defines a method,
creates an instance, and call a method on the instance.

<defclass company stock_symbol price revenue expenses>
 <defmethod PE_ratio>
   .price.<divide .revenue.<minus .expenses/> />



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@d...>
To: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>; "XML DEV"
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: Re:  Adam Bosworth Article - what does
"directaccess" m ean?

> At 11:15 AM 1/16/2003 -0500, W. E. Perry wrote:
> >Jonathan Robie wrote:
> >
> > > In XQuery, you can remain loosely coupled while improving the
> > > ratio of your code. The following computes the PE Ratio for IBM:
> > >
> > >     let $stock := document("stocks.xml")/stock[@id="IBM"]
> > >     return $stock/price / ($stock/revenues - $stock/expenses)
> > >
> > > I do think this is more elegant than the equivalent SAX or DOM.
It is no
> > > more tightly coupled.
> >
> >Oh yes it is. This code presupposes  1) a document of a given name;
> I was trying to write something equivalent to Adam's DOM sample,
which does
> specify the name. However, I agree that there can be real advantages
> accessing this through input() so that any document can be accessed
in this
> manner:
> let $stock := input()/stock[@id="IBM"]
> return $stock/price / ($stock/revenues - $stock/expenses)
> >2) a specifically-labelled ("IBM") ID on an element in that
document; 3)
> >specifically-labelled 'price' and 'revenue' information items which
are 4)
> >specifically presupposed to be part of that document (as opposed to
> >separately computable or capable of being looked up in some place
of greater
> >local interest, such as the last trade in a particular market)
> Walter, either the DOM program or the XQuery program can look up the
> before using them, and that does provide more flexibility, but
again, I was
> trying to compare apples to apples, and the DOM fragments that Adam
> do not do this.
> >and 5) [most crucial of all unexamined assumptions here]
presupposed to be
> >in a form
> >against which the computation expressed in the code is directly
> >(though, of course as 'real' XML the only form that they would
necessarily be
> >in is Unicode text).
> No, the XQuery I showed you does not make this assumption.
> The data might be in an XML document that can be accessed and parsed
> the document() function, or it might be in a view of some other
> such as a relational database.
> Jonathan
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.