• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML and ConciseXML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:57:15 -0500
• In-reply-to: <013a01c2bfeb$4ca50c60$6601a8c0@n...>

mplusch@c... (Mike Plusch) writes:
>Isn't there anyone out there who thinks it
>is ridiculous to have a syntax that uses
>126 characters to express an integer?

Perhaps, but most of them are probably not on this particular mailing
list.  You may find that such arguments get a lot more traction
elsewhere.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML and ConciseXML
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• References:
  • XML and ConciseXML
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess"m ean?
• Next by Date: RE: XML and ConciseXML
• Previous by thread: XML and ConciseXML
• Next by thread: RE: XML and ConciseXML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread