• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML and ConciseXML
• From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:57:20 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1023-D34F34F32BDF11D7AFB80003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

mplusch@c... wrote:
>Isn't there anyone out there who thinks it
>is ridiculous to have a syntax that uses
>126 characters to express an integer?


Yes, the person who made this particular bit of markup probably
shouldn't have.
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and ConciseXML
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • Re: XML and ConciseXML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Infoset of RFC2396 syntax
• Next by Date: Re: Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML and ConciseXML
• Next by thread: Re: XML and ConciseXML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread