• To: mplusch@c... (Mike Plusch)
• Subject: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:41:23 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist), xml-dev@l... (xml-dev)
• In-reply-to: <007a01c2c0a5$353b22c0$61a8a8c0@c...> from "Mike Plusch" at Jan 20, 2003 11:58:51 AM

Mike Plusch scripsit:

> There is always an XML 1.0 representation for
> ConciseXML.  Here is Water Type and Water
> Contract in XML 1.0:
> 
> <defclass>
>   <field key="person"/>
>   <field key="name"> required string </field>
>   <field key="age"> optional integer </field>
>   <field key="birth"> optional datetime </field>
>   <field key="_precond">
>     <defmethod> <not age.<is optional/>.
>                              <and birth.<is optional/> />
>     </defmethod>
>   </field>
> </defclass>

Rubbish.

Everything between "<defmethod>" and "</defmethod>" is not XML.

-- 
One art / There is                      John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
No less / No more                       http://www.reutershealth.com
All things / To do                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With sparks / Galore                     -- Douglas Hofstadter

• References:
  • Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Next by Date: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Previous by thread: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Next by thread: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread