• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>, Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@p...>,"Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org (E-mail)" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Which XML Processor is behaving correctly.
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:37:55 +0100
• In-reply-to: <3E2D2851.1040003@p...>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7C822@R...> <3E2D2851.1040003@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Bill de hÓra wrote:
> (OT: do consider not using a top posting style on this list - it makes 
> browsing threads you're involved in a two pass effort as well as having 
> to skip over your .sig - aside from the fact that placing your sig in 
> the middle of a post will truncate that post in some muas)

http://www.bbspot.com/News/2003/01/outlook.html

<bg/>

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • RE: Which XML Processor is behaving correctly.
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Which XML Processor is behaving correctly.
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Next by Date: Validating stylesheet
• Previous by thread: Re: Which XML Processor is behaving correctly.
• Next by thread: thankx Joe Fawcett , i really worked :)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread