Re: SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal
tbray@t... (Tim Bray) writes: >This is a plausible argument, but I don't buy it - I think that >hyperlinks are one of the defining characteristics of the Web and at >the end of the day are content not presentation. The #1 reason XLink >has not taken off is that Microsoft has not seen fit to implement it >in IE. Perhaps for once we should all be grateful to Microsoft for not implementing the 1.0 version of a W3C spec, thereby giving us time to reconsider the supposed merits of the XLink spec and its present approach. (I'd be happier if they'd done that with W3C XML Schema as well, but this isn't so bad.) SkunkLink's approach makes far more sense to me for in-line linking than does XLink's approach, and seems likely to be far more to attractive to browser developers deciding whether or not to invest the time needed to incorporate such mechanisms in their browsers. I'd love to have out-of-line linking someday, but don't consider XLink's approach to that particularly sensible either. (Yes, I'm working on more positive proposals. The XLink WG is dead. Long live - or get started - XML hypertext linking!) -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format