[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: many-to-many

• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:24:50 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1023-8B5F516F315611D78F1A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Jan 26, 2003 12:49:40 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> I give up at this point.  The SW people are welcome to write whatever
> they want, and I'll stop pretending that it affects me.  The REST people
> have taught me a lot about the value of lots of nouns and few verbs, but
> at this point I find their definitions too constraining.  Can I have
> some adjectives, please?  I don't just want a pony, I want a red pony. I
> might even want the red pony.

Fine, but if you are not careful you will wind up with _The Red Pony_,
an excellent work of fiction by John Steinbeck.  This has the advantage
that it will not crap under your Christmas tree.

-- 
Eric Raymond is the Margaret Mead               John Cowan
of the Open Source movement.                    jcowan@r...
        --Lloyd A. Conway,                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
          amazon.com review                     http://www.reutershealth.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: JITTs related article
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread