[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?

• To: 'Paul Prescod' <paul@p...>, Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: RE: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:51:54 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Then use a syntax-only specification for the URI 
and drop the resource-to-representation abstraction 
for binding names to documents. 

What breaks?

Dare to do less. :-)

len

From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...]

The TAG's job is to define those principles for the Web. If 
you deny them the right to exclude you deny them the ability to succeed.

• Prev by Date: Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?
• Next by Date: Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many)
• Previous by thread: RE: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: many-to-many)
• Next by thread: [ANN] XMLDistilled Editor Pro v2.0 Beta
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread