• To: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• From: "Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@s...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:26:49 -0700
• References: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B026545@w...>

> It's not, although by default it is.  To declare child elements as
> unordered, place them in an <interleave> element.
>

Heh, about an hour after I posted my original post, I came across the
<interleave> node. Bravo to RelaxNG for allowing flexible node ordering.

> a) if order doesn't matter, choose one (because it doesn't matter!)
> b) if order does matter, declare the correct order
>

I suppose the main reason for wanting/needing unordered (or any-ordered)
elements is if you're receiving XML documents from different sources, be it
applications or users/vendors. It seems to be a serious pain to report back
to them that the document failed validation just because element "B" was
listed before element "A"...

-BKN

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
    • From: Brian Burridge <maillist@b...>
  • SWF using XML
    • From: "Sandeep Paradkar" <sandeep.paradkar@l...>

• References:
  • RE: Can XML Schemas do this?
    • From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>

• Prev by Date: thankx Joe Fawcett , i really worked :)
• Next by Date: SWF using XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Can XML Schemas do this?
• Next by thread: SWF using XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread