Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
Even the trivial example given says that it is not SGML compliant. Unless some SGML old-timer can show otherwise, positional attributes aren't supported. - Mitch Amiano Sam Hunting wrote: [...snip...] > Of course, it's nice to see SGML minimization techniques ("</>") > re-invented. It would be a fun exercise to see if ConciseXML was, if not > XML compliant, SGML conformant! > > Sam Hunting > eTopicality, Inc.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format