[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• From: Mitch Amiano <mamiano@n...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:44:03 -0500
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0301171511210.21699-100000@w...>
• Organization: Software Adjuvant
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0301171511210.21699-100000@w...>
• Reply-to: mamiano@n...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030104

Even the trivial example given says that it is not SGML compliant.
Unless some SGML old-timer can show otherwise, positional attributes aren't supported.

- Mitch Amiano

Sam Hunting wrote:
[...snip...]
> Of course, it's nice to see SGML minimization techniques ("</>")
> re-invented. It would be a fun exercise to see if ConciseXML was, if not
> XML compliant, SGML conformant! 
> 
> Sam Hunting
> eTopicality, Inc.

• References:
  • Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
    • From: Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• Next by Date: Re: ConciseXML syntax
• Previous by thread: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• Next by thread: Re: ConciseXML syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread