• To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@a...>
• Subject: RE: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
• From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:00:34 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <20030128074415.E2173@w...>

>If you meant that the probability of somebody already
>having a URI for an obscure concept like "what Jonathan's thinking
about
>right now" is low, then I'd agree.  But it's still non-zero.

I'm thinking it might be nice to have a community project for assigning
URIs to all things that are a member of the set of things that have no
URI assigned to them.

This it seems to me will help to solve many of the problems discussed
under this perma-thread.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• References:
  • Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
• Next by Date: Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
• Previous by thread: Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
• Next by thread: Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread