• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...)
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:33:36 -0600
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7C802@R...>

>>I'm not sure how the latter thread (ConciseXML) argues against direct
access. Adam Bosworth is arguing for better support for processing XML
in programming languages/APIs while Mike seems to be arguing for a
mechanism for serializing objects to markup. Both threads seem
complementary to me. <<

I agree-- I was just addressing the fact that Walter was making claims
against serialization while Mike was making claims for it. The Bosworth part
of the Bosworth thread wasn't where I saw the irony emerging.

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • RE: Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...)
• Next by Date: Re: ConciseXML syntax and compatibility
• Previous by thread: RE: Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...)
• Next by thread: ConciseXML rationale
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread