Re: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access"mean?
Martin Klang wrote: > let me see if i got this right -> if i use/write/promote a tool based on a limited > datamodel, i'm threating the future of XML?? No. If, however, you promote an *XML* based on a limited datamodel you are threatening not just the future but the present of XML (and for that matter the backward-, legacy-compatible past). I am not speaking of a use, nor an application, nor a profile of XML here, but of the concept of XML itself. The promise of XML is interoperability. That is a subtle thing, which occurs in different ways and in different levels at once. Within the document there is interaction among the elements, and further interaction among all of the identifiable markup artifacts. Interactions take place in a particular instantiated instance, and those particular interactions, like that instance, may well be unique. That instantiation is built on the output of a parse--a parse of a specific XML document in particular circumstances on a specific occasion by a specific parser, and then manipulated by a particular processor to produce a particular data instantiation from the parse. There is no inherent nor persistent connection between the XML document parsed and the data instantiation ultimately built on a given occasion upon the output of that parse. This means that the interrelationship and the interactions of the elements and other markup artifacts of an XML document will vary with each instantiation of data from that document. Likewise the relationships between documents or between versions of a given document will vary as differing datastructures are instantiated from those documents on various occasions out of independent parses. Within all of this difference, where does the basis for interoperability lie? In the XML syntax of the documents themselves. It is precisely because XML documents can be used by different processes as the basis for entirely different function that such a document can be the nexus of interoperability between dissimilar, autonomous, and perhaps mutually anonymous processes. A datamodel, however, is nothing more than the abstraction of the particular data instantiation built on a particular occasion on the output of a particular parse of a given XML document. The document is the only thing in that chain of process with more than ephemeral existence. Any particular data instantiation is no more than an accident of the specific circumstances of a given parse, and then of the particular manipulation of the output of that parse. A datamodel which is the schematic of that data instance is no more than the abstraction of that accident. Respectfully, Walter Perry
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format