[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: many-to-many

Re:  many-to-many
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote,
> Ok.  That makes sense.  The model is the selector and there can be
> many selectors (I know that is not official terminology but I am
> comfortable with that).
> Then, the IETF 2396 spec can't formally map to RDF. It has terms which
> have no equivalents.

That's right IMO.

> It is as if the authors should have separated the syntax specification
> for creating the URI from any spec for a means of using it as an
> identifier in a process of separately specified identification.

Well, they tried. After all the title is "Uniform Resource Identifiers: 
Generic *Syntax*". But somehow or other a couple of paras of something 
else crept in and have been causing trouble ever since. If they were 
just snipped out it'd be no great loss.

> Another example of doing less is more?

Could be ...




Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.