XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - October, 2001

• Re: Has XML run its course?
  • From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@c...>
• Re: %x;? - Opportunity for pedantry and exegesis
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
• Re: Has XML run its course?
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Magick, Brian" <Brian.Magick@C...>
• Re: %x;? - Opportunity for pedantry and exegesis
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: schema validator
  • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• MSXML - Associating a different XSLT processing instruction
  • From: RArul@n...
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• RE: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@a...>
• Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• adding semantics to CALS tables?
  • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
  • From: "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@a...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: Max Dunn <maxdunn@s...>
• RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Xml Using VB
  • From: Pranav <pranav@i...>
• RE: Xml Using VB
  • From: "Stout, Joel R" <Stout.Joel@e...>
• RE: Xml Using VB
  • From: "Britt, James" <James.Britt@p...>
• Re: Xml Using VB
  • From: MJRyan <mjryan@s...>
• Re: Xml Using VB
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policyon patents])
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Calculation.
  • From: Michel.LACOMBE@f...
• Re: Separating content from presentation
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Re: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous newpolicy on patents])
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Re: Calculation.
  • From: Mike Moran <mmoran@n...>
• Re: [Zvon announcement] Character and characterreferencessearch
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@i...>
• [ZVON] XML Schema 2001 Reference
  • From: Jiri Jirat <Jiri.Jirat@i...>
• Re: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous newpolicy on patents])
  • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• W3C response on patents
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous n ewpolicy on patents])
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• OASIS TC Call For Participation: Provisioning Services
  • From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• RE: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous n ewpolicy on patents])
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• RE: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous n ewpolicy on patents])
  • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• Re: Re: Separating content from presentation
  • From: Vance Christiaanse <cintech@t...>
• wutka DTD parser question
  • From: Wendi Sisson <wsisson@e...>
• RE: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• RE: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: wutka DTD parser question
  • From: bob mcwhirter <bob@w...>
• Re: wutka DTD parser question
  • From: mrossi@c...
• Re: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Re: wutka DTD parser question
  • From: Fredrik Lindgren <fredrik.lindgren@c...>
• Re: wutka DTD parser question
  • From: Lauren Wood <lauren@s...>
• Re: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Re: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• RE: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Check out the latest program for the XML Conference andExpositio n 2001!
  • From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@i...>
• Extracting GIF image in ASP?
  • From: Byron Stuart <byrons@o...>
• Re: wutka DTD parser question
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Check out the latest program for the XML Conference andExpositio n 2001!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Extracting GIF image in ASP?
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@n...>
• Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines
  • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• RE: Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines
  • From: "SHARPE, Ian" <Ian.SHARPE@c...>
• The need for some minimal rhetorical conventions for XMLmarkup (was Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• Re: Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: mrossi@c...
• RE: Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Re: Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• RE: OASIS TC Call For Participation: Provisioning Services
  • From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• Re: Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: mrossi@c...
• more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• Geographic Markup Language
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Geographic Markup Language
  • From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: mrossi@c...
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: mrossi@c...
• RE: Are subelements significant by themselves?
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Merge to compare
  • From: Apostolos DEREKIS <derekis@e...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Re: more on "subelement significance"
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>
• Re: Geographic Markup Language
  • From: Mike Clarke <m-clarke@n...>
• W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@m...>
• Re: more on "subelement significance"
  • From: Mike Moran <mmoran@n...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• XFORMS
  • From: Jon Ceanfaglione <Jcean@c...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Re: RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• Re: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: XFORMS
  • From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@m...>
• [REPOST] RE: XFORMS
  • From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@m...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Re: XFORMS
  • From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <prof@i...>
• Conversational XML
  • From: Mike Moran <mmoran@n...>
• Re: Conversational XML
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>
• RE: Geographic Markup Language
  • From: Juan Chu Chow <jchuchow@s...>
• RE: Ambiguous Content Model
  • From: Mark Endicott <MEndicott@t...>
• Software Engineer Opportunity in NYC
  • From: Larry Eisenstat <EisenstatL@T...>
• XML+JDBC=data portability (IBM tutorials)
  • From: Jeffrey I Condon <jicondon@u...>
• Re: MSV
  • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@s...>
• RE: Ambiguous Content Model
  • From: Imran Rashid <irashid@s...>
• Re: Ambiguous Content Model
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• RAND issues
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• RE: more on "subelement signicance"
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Re: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: sateesh narahari <narahari@h...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Qualifying links
  • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: Qualifying links
  • From: sateesh narahari <narahari@h...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• prob in picking xsd file
  • From: "Hanumaiahgari, Srinivas" <Srinivas.Hanumaiahgari@d...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>
• Re: Ambiguous Content Model
  • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• When do I Create entity reference nodes
  • From: "Gupta, Rajan" <rajan.gupta@i...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: David Orchard <orchard@p...>
• Schemas Vs DTDs
  • From: Amol <amolrp@p...>
• set encoding attribute
  • From: Ursprung Manfred <Manfred.Ursprung@b...>
• RE: set encoding attribute
  • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• XML articles in ADTMAG
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@m...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@m...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• Real time XML Parser
  • From: Gordon Stewart <gordon.stewart@n...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: Steve Muench <Steve.Muench@o...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@n...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@n...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Real time XML Parser
  • From: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• Re: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Adobe XMP?
  • From: Alan Lillich <alillich@a...>
• Surprise?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@d...>
• RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• The Long and Winding Road
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: prob in picking xsd file
  • From: Priscilla Walmsley <priscilla@w...>
• Re: prob in picking xsd file
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>
• RE: RAND issues
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: RAND issues
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Linking documents that "belong" together == Best Practices
  • From: Adam Van Den Hoven <Adam.Hoven@b...>
• Re: Latest version of MSV
  • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>
• Re: Latest version of MSV
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>
• Re: Re: Latest version of MSV
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• CATALOGs versus RDDL
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• MSV and Xerces
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Thanks to HP & Oracle
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III <winchel@m...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Fwd: dtd to c struct conversion
  • From: Marcus Hardt <majordormo@w...>
• DTD for Data Visualization ?
  • From: Dean Arnold <darnold@p...>
• RE: Fwd: dtd to c struct conversion
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• what's special in XMLNS attribue .?
  • From: yael efrat <yaele@o...>
• Re: what's special in XMLNS attribue .?
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• RDDL in ZIP
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• DOM
  • From: Avital Nagar <Avital@c...>
• RE: DOM
  • From: "Williams, Timothy W." <TIMOTHY.W.WILLIAMS@s...>
• RDDL What is it ?
  • From: Ursprung Manfred <Manfred.Ursprung@b...>
• AW: RDDL What is it ?
  • From: "Harbarth, Juliane" <Juliane.Harbarth@s...>
• RE: RDDL What is it ?
  • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Re: RDDL What is it ?
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Nested DTDs
  • From: BillGong <billinfo@s...>
• Re: Nested DTDs
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
• Re: Nested DTDs
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
• Reminder: OASIS UBL TC Call For Participation
  • From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Why RAND RF May Be A Good Idea
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• [Zvon] An announcement for Python fans
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@i...>
• storing XML files
  • From: Albena Georgieva <albena@i...>
• Re: what's special in XMLNS attribue .?
  • From: yael efrat <yaele@o...>
• good free tutorial for beginners
  • From: kaab kaoutar <kaab_k@h...>
• RE: storing XML files
  • From: Chris Parkerson <chrisp@e...>
• RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
  • From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@m...>
• RE: good free tutorial for beginners
  • From: JR Ketelsen <jr.ketelsen@f...>
• Re: storing XML files
  • From: Soumitra Sengupta <soumitra@b...>
• Re: what's special in XMLNS attribue .?
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Re: what's special in XMLNS attribue .?
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• white spaces
  • From: "Caro, Samuel" <Samuel.Caro@U...>
• Re: white spaces
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• standards vs. the public
  • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...>
• Re: what's special in XMLNS attribue .?
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Re: standards vs. the public
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• About W3C patent policy
  • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: MSV and Xerces
  • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>
• Re: RDDL in ZIP
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs ( was: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C asGold en Goose ...))
  • From: Ralph Hilken <ralph.hilken@a...>
• Re: [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• Re: [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• cl-xml 0.915
  • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Re: storing XML files
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Re: white spaces
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• [Fwd: Re: storing XML files]
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• schema trouble
  • From: Ian Rogers <ian.rogers@n...>
• RE: storing XML files
  • From: Herman van Gelderen <herman.van.gelderen@c...>
• Re: schema trouble
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Re: Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
  • From: Tony.Coates@r...
• Re: schema trouble
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• RE: Why RAND RF May Be A Good Idea
  • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Reminder: OASIS Topic Maps Published Subjects TC Call ForParticipation
  • From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• unsubscribe
  • From: Jörg Flotho <j.flotho@a...>
• Re: schema trouble
  • From: Laura Hatcher <lhatcher@a...>
• RE: Why RAND RF May Be A Good Idea
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: storing XML files
  • From: Albena Georgieva <albena@i...>
• Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• RE: storing XML files
  • From: "Scherpenzeel, Wim" <Wim.Scherpenzeel@s...>