• From: Mark Endicott <MEndicott@t...>
• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:49:04 -0400

Hi all.

I have been lurking for a while, but this is my first post. I appologize in
advance for any etiquite violations!

It appears to me that (A,B)*, A? isn't impossible. Wouldn't this lead to the
following list of possible child elements?

	(no children)
	A
	A, B
	A, B, A
	A, B, A, B
	A, B, A, B, A
	...

This pattern is specified by (A,B)* | (A, (B, A)*). 


-----Original Message-----
From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:kohsukekawaguchi@y...]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 7:27 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Ambiguous Content Model



> >      Niiice! You da man Rick. Back to logic class for me. :-) World o'
> > thanks.
>  
> I think Marcus Carr mentioned a difficult one:  ( A, B)*, A?

I thought it was me but anyway, this is not a difficult one; this is an
impossible one.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Ambiguous Content Model
    • From: Imran Rashid <irashid@s...>
  • Re: Ambiguous Content Model
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Geographic Markup Language
• Next by Date: Software Engineer Opportunity in NYC
• Previous by thread: Re: Conversational XML
• Next by thread: RE: Ambiguous Content Model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread