Re: XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups
I think that Len meant that being around 4 years was insufficient justification in itself for starting work on XML 2.0; rather, a list of putative mistakes, dubious decisions, omissions and potential enhancements would drive people to initiate action. Of course, you probably didn't mean that being around 4 years was a good reason in itself either. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lyon" <david@g...> To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>; <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:59 PM Subject: Re: XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups > > Claude, > > I disagree with your statement about difficulty. There are many parts of > xml 1.0 that are particularly difficult and innefficient. One only has to > look to the questions posted on this list to see that. >
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format